首页> 外文OA文献 >Where is kinship information in the child's face? Signal detection study finds no evidence for lateralization.
【2h】

Where is kinship information in the child's face? Signal detection study finds no evidence for lateralization.

机译:孩子脸上的亲属信息在哪里?信号检测研究没有发现偏侧化的证据。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. Dal Martello & Maloney (2006, JOV ) report signal detection experiments measuring the amount of kinship information in the upper and lower halves of children's faces. They found that the upper and lower halves each contained significant information about kinship with the upper half of the face containing considerably more than the lower. The information in the two halves was statistically independent. \ud\udPrevious work has shown that information about age, attractiveness, gender, identity, expression and lip-reading tends to be left-right lateralized. We test whether this is the case for kinship. \ud\udMethods. Stimuli: 30 pairs of photographs, each photograph portraying a child's face with background removed. Half were of siblings, half, unrelated. The children's ages spanned 14 years. Observers: 124 adult observers who judged each pair as siblings or not. We summarized performance in each condition by signal detection estimates d′ and β. Conditions: Full Face visible (FF); Right Half visible (RH); Left Half visible (LH). Different observers participated in each condition. \ud\udResults. Performance in FF (d′ = 1.079) did not differ significantly (p = n.s.) from performance in RH condition (d′ = 1.024) or from performance in LH (d' = 1.004). Performance in RH and LH did not differ significantly (p = n.s.). The beta values of FF (β = 0.888) and RH (β = 0.896) did not differ (p = n.s.) and indicated an equal bias towards saying related. The beta for LH (β = 1.102) differed significantly (p = 0.0001) from betas on the other conditions. \ud\udConclusion. Kinship cues appear to be evenly distributed across the vertical halves of the face and completely redundant. There is no superiority of one or the other side of the observed face for kinship. Observers have a bias against saying 'related' when the right half of the face is masked.
机译:目的。 Dal Martello&Maloney(2006,JOV)报告了信号检测实验,该实验测量了儿童面部上半部和下半部的亲属信息量。他们发现上半部分和下半部分分别包含有关亲属关系的重要信息,而脸的上半部分比下半部分包含更多的信息。两半的信息在统计上是独立的。 \ ud \ ud先前的研究表明,有关年龄,吸引力,性别,身份,表情和口述的信息倾向于左右偏侧。我们测试是否属于亲属关系。 \ ud \ udMethods。刺激:30张照片,每张照片都描绘了去除背景的孩子的脸。一半是兄弟姐妹,一半是无关的。孩子们的年龄跨度为14岁。观察者:124位成人观察者,他们将每一对视为兄弟姐妹。我们通过信号检测估计值d'和β总结了每种情况下的性能。条件:全脸可见(FF);右半可见(RH);左半可见(LH)。不同的观察者参与了每种情况。 \ ud \ ud结果。 FF(d'= 1.079)的性能与RH条件(d'= 1.024)或LH(d'= 1.004)的性能无明显差异(p = n.s.)。 RH和LH的性能没有显着差异(p = n.s.)。 FF(β= 0.888)和RH(β= 0.896)的beta值没有差异(p = n.s.),表示对相关说法的偏见。 LH的beta(β= 1.102)与其他条件下的beta有显着差异(p = 0.0001)。 \ ud \ ud结论。亲属线索似乎均匀分布在面部的垂直两半上,并且完全多余。所观察到的脸的一侧或另一侧对于亲属关系没有优势。当面部的右半部被遮盖时,观察者倾向于说“相关”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号